Bibliomancy: William Kennedy on Literary Obscurity

Bibliomancy collects insights and observations about the reading/writing life and life in the arts generally, words that could aptly describe the reasons Atelier26 exists.
 
"I am now as much awash in critical magnanimity as I was bathed two years ago in insolvent obscurity. The nature of this new status is extreme pleasure, but also part of it is residual bewilderment at the causes of the previous condition. I was once deeply resentful at the rejection of Ironweed — it was rejected thirteen times — but of course I am slowly coming out of that. ... It is the substance of the rejections that is disconcerting; and that substance is twofold. First:  My immediately previous novel, Billy Phelan’s Greatest Game, was not only not a best-seller, it was a worst-seller. Was the book’s lack of sales the author’s fault? Well, I must have had something to do with it, but I won’t take full blame. Yet its failure to galvanize the American imagination in 1978 dogged my future. The line I heard most frequently was that publishers would rather take the risk on a first novelist than on a fourth novelist with a bleak track record. I hardly think this the received wisdom of the ages — to reward the apprentice at the expense of the journeyman. Literature, I suggest, deserves a different ordering of values. Scott Fitzgerald’s line that there are no second acts in American lives was the sad, solipsistic truth about that wonderful writer’s self-destructive career; but for those who take this as wisdom it can be a pernicious fallacy."--from William Kennedy's National Book Critics Circle Award acceptance speech, 1984

See also: Robert Louis Stevenson on Constancy, Honor, & Nobility in the Practice of Art